Why Julian Assange should have been killed

Outrageous statement… not really.  Julian Assange should have been killed because he is a spy and an enemy provocateur. The fruits of his attack on the U.S. has been the death of numerous assets that he revealed the names, villages, relatives’ and even precise GPS locations of Afghans co-operating with Nato forces that were accessed easily from files released by Assange, and have been killed as a result.  Besides the blood that is on his hands, letting him live set a precedent.
Julian Assange is not an American citizen and he has no constitutional rights. So, there’s no reason that the CIA can’t kill him. Moreover, ask yourself this question, If Julian Assange is killed tomorrow what message do you think that would send about releasing sensitive American data?
We witness the results of the precedent set by Assange with Snowden.  Snowden has quoted Assange several times in his interviews. Also defending Assange as a hero. He espouses the same beliefs that not only should the U. S. not be spying on it’s people but also the U.S. should not be spying on the other 95% of the world.
Then there is both these wackos cry of justification.  “The public has a right to know. Information wants to be free. The more you know the better.” There is some truth to that, but for the most part, it’s complete crap. If you don’t believe that, post the password to your email account and all your credit card info on the Internet. No why not? There should be no secrets, right?
Snowden had the ability to take his concerns to the Congress. There are myriads of avenues to Whistleblow.  Instead just as Assange did he ran and hid. He is releasing secrets piecemeal in a manner that does nothing to stop what he objects too, but does damage to U.S. security.
If Assange had been dealt with properly, Snowden would have acted within the law. After all he is a man of conscience, isn’t he?
Look at it this way, If we knew an Iranian spy had acquired the same information that Assange did and he intended to hand it over to Iran, the CIA wouldn’t hesitate to kill him. While we might prefer to arrest him, few Americans would protest if the CIA killed that spy before he could hand the data to Iran.
Assange did that one better. He didn’t just give sensitive information to one unfriendly regime. He gave the information to every hostile government in the world. Julian Assange may not be a terrorist nor is he using the same methods, but he has the same goal, to do as much damage to the United States as possible. He has now inspired a copycat with Snowden. Assange is the enemy of the American people and we will be safer when he’s dead.
That is why Assaange should have been killed.

Committing Suicide

Not me so no cheering. The Senate is poised to pass immigration reform. The main plank in it is Amnesty for the 11-40 million illegals in the country. Lindsey Graham John McCains hand maiden has predicted it will pass with an overwhelming majority.
Good I hope it does. Not another single event will cause more sitting members of the Senate to lose their seats. It will definitely destroy the Republican Party. No other issue is more destructive. The Republican base has spoken loud and clear. No Amnesty till the Border is Secure. PERIOD!
The Republicans are believing their own PR offices, but guess what guys. No one that votes is going to support you. You’re doomed to loose any chance of ever taking the Senate and if the House joins you in this debacle the 2010 elections will make the next midterms look like mild shift.
With all the economic problems, the violations to our Constitution these ass hats are going to pass a Bill that will legalize 11-40 million people that 70% are guranteed to vot Democrat and at the same time lost over half the people that vote for them. Suicide is the only way to describe this action.

A Good Summation of the last 5 years… and those that lead us

But we're not at War

Qaeda chief warns attacks on US in 'everyone's reach'

AFP - Al-Qaeda's military chief in Yemen warned Americans in an audio message posted online Sunday that the Boston bombings revealed a fragile security as he urged Muslims to defend their religion.
Qassim al-Rimi, the military chief of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, said making bombs such as the ones used in the twin blasts in Boston in April, is within "everyone's reach".
"The Boston events... and the poisoned letters (sent to the White House), regardless of who is behind them, show that your security is no longer under control, and that attacks on you have taken off and cannot be stopped," he said, in the message entitled: "A letter to the American people."
"Every day you will be hit by the unexpected and your leaders will not be able to defend you," warned the man whose organisation is considered by Washington the world's most dangerous Al-Qaeda branch.
Rimi said the killing of Al-Qaeda's founder Osama bin Laden in May 2011 and top Yemeni-American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in September 2011, had not ended the struggle.
"Have you eliminated the jihadist groups that have spread everywhere after they had only been in Afghanistan? Today, they are in your land or close to it," he warned.

Just because your not at war with them does not mean that they aren't planning on killing you....

15 Years Ago

Worth the watch the beginning of an evolution of news, watch and take a lesson in life.
This speech is important.

Sunday Funnies

I don't know but Sunday always had funnies in the Newspapers. Since Newspapers are dead the funnies are now on the TV in the form of Political interviews. Here was the best laugh of the day.  Dan Pfeiffer was sent out on all the Sunday shows with a script of bull, just as Susan Rice was. He said the same thing on every show. He even told Clinton's boy that the "Law was Irrelevant". The sad part is there are many who are buying this comedy as actual fact. Well what can you say except many people lack integrity. This one with old Liberal MSM Dinosaur Bob Schieffer is actually painful to watch.

 It is however the New Sunday Funnies.... Shame they're not funny

You Tell Me...2

Under the fold are the Articles of Impeachment that were brought against Richard Nixon. You tell me after you read those Articles what did Nixon do then, that Obama isn’t doing NOW ?
Just wanted to flesh out the thought, since there are so many in denial out there at what has been going on.
1) Mitch McConnell’s office was bugged, we found that out about a month ago. 
2) The IRS has been used as a weapon against the Presidents enemies.
3) The Administration lied to the public, and has lied under oath several times, engaging in multiple cover ups.
The question is of course Mr. President what did you know and when did you know it ? The difference between Richard Nixon and Barack Obama is that back in the 70s it was expected of our President to be an Honest man.  It is no longer expected or is it a shock that those who hold high office have no integrity or honesty.
All that matters is the agenda, and the agenda is not one founded in American roots. I read the comments on here and made by others in and on the airways. We must protect the President, we must protect the next President Hillary. I ask you why?
What does it say about people, that who they want to lead them are those that have committed these crimes. It’s the same as with those that vote for the IRA/SF over there. You promote and endorse the behavior of those you support.
That means whatever behavior they engaged in once you know about it, and still vote for them… You are just as guilty of their crimes.

It must be Bush’s fault….

A very funny headline is running here in the States.

GOVT TAPS PRESS PHONE

RECORDS FOR MONTHS

It seems that the Obama Administration has been violating the privacy and sanctity of the Press… Ahhh what a shock. I’m sure the press won’t mind, why would they? They don’t mind abuse of power of the IRS going after Tea Party Organizations, Jewish Organizations, including the demanding of lists of all members and donors of those organizations.
We have in power a group of people that believe they are above the law. The check and balance of a government that violates the Law is a vigilant Press Corps. What we have had for over a decade is a Press that no longer is interested in the truth, but instead has been in pursuit of an ideological agenda.
Well they have been very successful at supporting that agenda rather than being the guardians of truth. It is only just that they get to receive some of the benefits they are in a large part responsible for.

Music

Just Offensive

White House Meets Privately with Press to Discuss Benghazi

In the White House’s latest efforts at transparency, the administration announced to reporters that it would brief reporters on the latest shocking developments about the Benghazi situation … behind closed doors. Politico reports that the meeting started at approximately 12:45 PM ET, and that it moved the normal press briefing to 1:45 PM ET. Jay Carney, White House press secretary, did not comment on whether the meeting took place.

Politico reports:

The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

The administration routinely exerts pressure on reporters it feels are not kind enough in their coverage. Reporters like Cheryl Attkisson of CBS News have felt the hand of their bosses for “wading dangerously close to advocacy” with regard to Benghazi. No doubt this “off-the-record” meeting was designed to get all the president’s horses and all the president’s men to put the Benghazi humpty dumpty together again.

UPDATE: Reporters not invited to the off-the-record briefing are reportedly incredibly unhappy about it:

UPDATE II: Jake Tapper of CNN reports that the regularly scheduled press briefing has been delayed even further:

UPDATE III: Politico now reports that the meeting has been characterized as "deep background." The existence of the meeting itself is considered "off-the-record." White House spokesman Josh Earnest said, "Deep background means that the info presented by the briefers can be used in reporting but the briefers can't be quoted." So expect a fair number of "White House sources" to appear in reportage for the next few days.

UPDATE IV: Jay Carney began his on-the-record press briefing by announcing that 14 news organizations were invited to the closed door briefing, but that it was not a substitute for the on-the-record briefing. He then announced that it was "erroneous" to describe the briefing as "off-the-record," and instead suggested it was "deep background."

Ben Shapiro is Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the New York Times bestseller “Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America” (Threshold Editions, January 8, 2013).